In this article
- What is andragogy?
- Knowles' six principles of adult learning
- 1. The need to know
- 2. Self-concept
- 3. The role of experience
- 4. Readiness to learn
- 5. Orientation to learning
- 6. Motivation
- Andragogy vs pedagogy
- The limits of andragogy
- How to apply andragogy to workplace training
- Start with the why
- Use real problems, not abstract topics
- Make experience part of the content
- Give people choices
- Time it to the need
- Adjust the level of guidance
- Andragogy in practice
- Frequently asked questions
Most people can remember a training session that felt like being back at school. A presenter at the front, slides full of definitions, a quiz at the end and very little connection to the problems waiting back at their desk. The content may have been perfectly accurate. It just wasn't designed for adults.
Andragogy is the attempt to fix that. Instead of asking how to teach, it asks how adults learn, and the answer changes almost every decision in a training programme, from the first minute of a session to how its success is measured.
What is andragogy?
Andragogy is the theory and practice of helping adults learn. The term was first used by the German teacher Alexander Kapp in 1833, but it was the American educator Malcolm Knowles who made it popular from the late 1960s onwards, most notably in his book The Modern Practice of Adult Education.
Knowles started from a simple observation: adults arrive at a learning situation with experience, responsibilities and reasons of their own. Treating them as empty vessels, as traditional teaching often does with children, wastes all three. Andragogy builds on them instead.
Knowles' six principles of adult learning
Knowles described a set of assumptions about adult learners that grew over the years to six. They are better read as tendencies than rules, but together they explain why so much workplace training misses the mark.
1. The need to know
Adults want to understand why they should learn something before they invest time in it. A course that starts with "today we'll cover" loses them; one that starts with a problem they recognise has their attention.
2. Self-concept
Adults see themselves as responsible for their own decisions and resist being treated as if they weren't. They engage more when they have some say in what and how they learn.
3. The role of experience
Adults bring years of experience, which is both a resource and an obstacle. It gives new ideas something to attach to, but it also comes with habits that may need to be unlearned. Good adult training draws on that experience instead of ignoring it.
4. Readiness to learn
Adults are most ready to learn what they need for a situation they are facing now: a new role, a new tool, a difficult conversation coming up next week. The same content offered too early rarely sticks.
5. Orientation to learning
Adults learn around problems and tasks, not around subjects. "How to handle a customer who wants a discount" works better than "principles of negotiation", even if the content underneath is the same.
6. Motivation
External motivators such as promotion or pay matter, but Knowles argued that the strongest drivers for adults are internal: confidence, job satisfaction, a sense of progress. Training that makes people feel more capable earns more commitment than training that is simply compulsory.
Andragogy vs pedagogy
Knowles originally framed andragogy as the opposite of pedagogy, the art of teaching children. He later softened that view and described the two as ends of a spectrum: the same adult may need a more directed approach in a completely new field and a more self-directed one in an area they know well.
Pedagogy | Andragogy | |
|---|---|---|
Who decides what to learn | The teacher | Shared with the learner |
Role of experience | Limited, the learner has little | Central, it is the main resource |
Readiness | Set by age and curriculum | Set by real needs and situations |
Orientation | Subject-centred | Problem-centred |
Motivation | Mainly external (grades, approval) | Mainly internal (competence, purpose) |
The limits of andragogy
Andragogy is widely used, but it isn't beyond criticism, and knowing its weak points makes it more useful.
The most common objection is that it describes good teaching rather than something unique to adults. Many children learn better through problems and experience, and many adults prefer clear instruction when a subject is new to them. That is exactly why Knowles himself ended up treating it as a spectrum.
A second criticism is that it assumes every adult is a confident, self-directed learner. In practice, people who have had poor experiences with education, or who are learning something entirely unfamiliar, often need more structure and support at the start, not less. Self-direction is a goal to build towards, not a starting point to assume.
How to apply andragogy to workplace training
Start with the why
Open every programme with the problem it solves, ideally in the participants' own terms. If you can't explain why the training matters to their work, that is a sign it may not be the right training.
Use real problems, not abstract topics
Build sessions around situations people actually face. A case drawn from last quarter's projects will always beat a generic textbook example. This is the same idea behind Kolb's experiential learning cycle: experience first, reflection and theory after.
Make experience part of the content
Ask participants how they handle the situation today before you introduce anything new. Their answers show you what to build on and what to challenge, and they let people learn from each other, which Bandura's social learning theory shows is one of the most powerful ways adults learn.
Give people choices
Wherever possible, let learners choose the order, pace or format. Even small choices, such as which scenario to tackle first, increase ownership.
Time it to the need
Offer training close to the moment people will use it. Manager training lands better in the first months of someone's first management role than two years before or after it. Our guide to management training and development shows how to plan for those moments.
Adjust the level of guidance
Give more structure to people who are new to a subject and more freedom to those who already know it well. The idea of pitching tasks just beyond what someone can do alone is developed in the zone of proximal development.
Andragogy in practice
Put Knowles' principles together and they describe a very specific kind of learning: problem-centred, built on experience, relevant right now and respectful of people's ability to decide. Simulations fit that description closely. Participants face a realistic situation, make their own decisions, see what happens and try again, without the consequences of getting it wrong at work. We explain the approach in our guide to training simulations.
Our catalogue includes more than 70 video games designed around these principles, available in up to 20 languages. Book your demo to see how they work.
Frequently asked questions
What is andragogy in simple terms?
Andragogy is the theory and practice of how adults learn. It holds that adults learn best when they understand why something matters, can draw on their own experience and are working on problems relevant to their lives or jobs.
What are Knowles' six principles of adult learning?
The need to know, self-concept, the role of experience, readiness to learn, orientation to learning and motivation. Together they describe adults as self-directed learners who learn best through relevant, problem-centred experiences.
What is the difference between andragogy and pedagogy?
Pedagogy refers to teaching children, with the teacher deciding what is learned and how. Andragogy focuses on adults, who share responsibility for their learning, bring experience to it and are motivated mainly by relevance and personal growth.
Who created andragogy?
The term was first used by Alexander Kapp in 1833, but Malcolm Knowles developed and popularised andragogy as a theory of adult learning from the late 1960s onwards.
How is andragogy used in corporate training?
It shapes training around real work problems, uses participants' experience as content, gives learners choices about how they learn and times training to the moment it is needed. Simulations and case-based learning are common ways to put it into practice.




